LinkedIn's promise
Pretty much all my business friends are on LinkedIn. According to Read Write Web, LinkedIn has around 20 million members and around 6.6 million monthly active users. They are the clear global market leaders in the business networking space—Centre Networks report that Xing, their closest competitor, had 5 million members in January 2008.So just what is it that LinkedIn is doing so right? And could it be doing that thing even better?
The LinkedIn promise
The heart of what makes a service or product successful is the power of the aspirations it evokes. Once we identify the core "promise" that the service holds out to us, we can then look at how effectively the its functionalities, workflows and UI amplify, filter and channel that promise into a rewarding and effective, tangible user experience (UX).
So what is LinkedIn's promise to its users?
First up, LinkedIn's self-avowed mission: "to help you be more effective in your daily work and open doors to opportunities using the relationships you already have". Hmm, not exactly snappy, eh? We're going to have to read between the lines and read the subtle cues here...
I would sum up my actual experience of using LinkedIn feels something more like this: "LinkedIn promises to bring my business card to life." LinkedIn seems to say to me: "we will extend your carefully-constructed business card and CV across your network for you, bringing you a wealth of serendipitous professional insights and opportunities."
So what, specifically, gives me this impression?
Visual branding—"corporate" and "creative" in counterpoint
LinkedIn's visual branding is deceptively subtle. At first glance, you might think it minimal and conservative. Lots of greyspace and whitespace around clean-edged boxes and tidy little icons; tightly controlled areas of colour.
But look more closely.
Within this conservative visual framework, there is actually a wealth of variety of gradient effects, block colour shades, corner shapes, button and border styles, list layouts. I can feel that the LinkedIn designers have had fun with this UI!
But look more closely.
Within this conservative visual framework, there is actually a wealth of variety of gradient effects, block colour shades, corner shapes, button and border styles, list layouts. I can feel that the LinkedIn designers have had fun with this UI!
To illustrate my point, here's a collage of fragments from the LinkedIn UI. (See if you can find them on the site itself—a treasure hunt!):

But so what? What does the subtleties of graphic design have to do with LinkedIn's core UX?
Well, the "corporate yet fun" visual branding perfectly expresses the "double promise" of LinkedIn that I suggested above: that you can both keep firm control of how people perceive your identity while also benefiting in serendipitous and unexpected ways by expressing that identity. In my experience, those two attributes tap into fairly universal human needs, so it's no surprise that LinkedIn is so successful.
Genteel gameplay
If LinkedIn was a game, it would be one that you couldn't easily lose at.As you build up the various aspects your profile, a little "profile completeness" status bar creeps up towards 100%. But there are no wrong moves or puzzling challenges in the profile building game—just the gentle incentive of that status bar and the hope that your contacts will view your professional identity in a better light and opportunities will flow.
By way of illustration, I found this image by blogger Stephanie Booth (though note also the somewhat disgruntled comment exchange under the original image!):

The status bar is classic LinkedIn. It says: "take your time, stay in control, just follow the instructions - but maybe, just maybe, this could lead on to unsuspected opportunities." That's a potent double promise.
Cherry picking the social web
It didn't escape observers' attention that the latest iteration of the LinkedIn site drew on key features of Facebook for inspiration - the Newsfeed on the Home page and the Questions and Answers features being two of the most conspicuous examples.But even when cherry picking the "bleeding edge" of the social web, LinkedIn keeps its brand promise. The content of the Newsfeed is just interesting enough to attract a curious glance from time to time (e.g. "[Your contact's name] added [someone else] as a contact"), but never strays into embarassing or awkward territory.
I will never read a message like "[Your contact name] just got the sack and is now unemployed" on LinkedIn. Engaging and potentially useful to observers as that message would be, it would LinkedIn's implied promise to help you maintain a positive professional image.
LinkedIn sucks, but it shouldn't care
When I asked my social media maven friends to tell me how well LinkedIn worked for them, their reaction was mixed.Here are a few of their twittered gripes:
"I find it takes too many clicks to see someone's connections. Also, interface isn't consistent." - Jof Arnold
"Always struck me as kind of thing that should be useful, but just not yet. Loathe to bail in case it's useful after I've gone." - Tim Duckett
"[J]ust an address-neutral repository of people I know, and an occasional source of annoying recruiters." - Alan Patrick
"LinkedIn would be cool if it had some decent apps..." - Steve Lawson
"It seems like it should be much more useful & effective than it is." - Pete Goold
So LinkedIn clearly isn't serving the early adopter crowd optimally, and I would imagine that must be impacting negatively on the amount of "buzz PR" they are getting on blogs, twitter, podcasts and so on.
But then again, why should LinkedIn care too much?
As I said at the beginning of this post, pretty much all my professional friends are on LinkedIn—despite their reservations about its utility. For early adopters, the bottom line is that LinkedIn works for them as a rolodex. And for those early adopters who aren't already maxed out with gainful employment, there is an additional hope (not necessarily expectation) that being on LinkedIn could generate new opportunities.
If LinkedIn jumped to the tune of every fleeting, outré social web trend in an effort to excite us early adopters, they would be breaking their brand promise of keeping the user in control of a dependable and familiar environment. They would risk alienating their mass market of late adopters.
And Reid Hoffman is far too clever to do that.
A message runs through it
If you've ever had the dubious privilege of eating a stick of Brighton Rock, you'll know that there's some message or other written pink or green into the white sugar, and that message goes through the length of the sweet.Great brands are like that. Everything they do communicates their brand promise.
Of course, I could only touch on small areas and aspects of LinkedIn's web (and indeed mobile) presence in this post. But it seems to me that wherever I turn on LinkedIn, I encounter the same double promise of safety and opportunity.
It's a great lesson in business focus.
Acknowledgements
My thanks to all my friends who helped me to clarify my thoughts on LinkedIn by sharing their own. While we're on the subject, why not check out their LinkedIn profiles, via my own (requires LinkedIn signin)? Maybe, just maybe, it could lead to professional opportunities for you...[UPDATE: Special thanks to Chris Osborne for pointing out an error in my LinkedIn statistics references—now corrected]


6 Comments:
Hi Luke, if Linkedin could provide better support for groups and have some form of events, it would really hit the mark as generally speaking, people will want to meetup around some group activity, weird they havent exploited that one yet.
Alex Craxton
Ofer asked me to make a comment...
NIce summary Luke. I struggled to know what it's really for. The only people who use it are Recruitment consultants who farm it for contacts and pester the rest of us.
Enjoyed this article.
LinkedIn catches us in a professional context, where we probably don't mind that basically it's a recruitment tool if it gives us benefits in the process? Facebook catches us in a personal context and will fail because when you start hitting people in that context with adverts they are not up for it - it's like people calling you at home on your landline to sell you gas/windows/electricity.
Kicking off the thought process, the reasons I can think of to use LinkedIn are:
- It's my window display on the career/opportunity high street.
- I can keep tabs on people I meet as I network for business/look for a job.
- I can join a group (go and use Meetup.com it's much better at this)
- It's a platform for social trust to support your online social relationships. People you meet, who you don't know well, can see who you are for real.
I would say that's enough to keep me interested?
Moving on to the people who pay for LinkedIn, i.e. the people looking to flog you stuff or offer you a job. Marketers/recruiters can sift through CV's as the richest source of keywords ever created around human talent, and find you.
My conclusion is that LinkedIn will increase the quality of recruitment for industries who have tech. savvy people in them. And it will shake up recruitment consultants, as HR departments with a bit of nouse can actually find people themselves. Which is a good thing.
Some Linkedin users use Linkedin for the purposes that imarkus articulated so well. However, for many savvy and less naive networkers Linkedin is simply a way of building large networks of known and many more unknown people.
This group of users has one main purpose, the direct conversion of data into dollars.
If you check the website
toplinked.com you will find that the top 50 most linked users have between 10,000 and 40,000 contacts. imarkus, have these people really met or even know that many professionals? The answer is simply no!
Well, in principle users should only connect to people they know. So how does it work? If you check the
toplinked 50 next to each such user there is a QuickConnect link. imarkus, you are only a few clicks away from becoming one of their “trusted” professional connections!
Other methods include:
Adding your email address to your job title. This would allow anyone to connect by choosing ‘Other’ in the invitation form and pasting the address.
Adding LION to your name. Of course, Linkedin users could be reported if they try to connect to “professionals” they don’t know. LION stands for the Linkedin Open Network. The secret handshake that invites you to invite.
“It's a platform for social trust to support your online social relationships”.
Sure, keep telling that to yourself. The reality is very different. It is fairly difficult to have a relationship with a database record.
“People you meet, who you don't know well, can see who you are for real.”
Who you are for real? Sure.
So how do they make money? I will mention very few examples:
[1]Building detailed marketing databases. Using recursive techniques one could build a large database.
[2]Direct marketing.
[3]Inviting users to participate in other social networks. For each referral a fee is paid.
[4]Slowly building their own social web applications.
Call them and complain
LinkedIn Corporation
1840 Embarcadero Rd.
Palo Alto, CA 94303
650-687-3600
Fax: 650-687-0505
https://www.linkedin.com
Feeling a bit disconnected? LinkedIn wants to help. The company is an online business network designed to help professionals find jobs, people, and services providers. LinkedIn offers four premium services: LinkedIn Jobs, LinkedIn Services, LinkedIn Groups, and LinkedIn Business Accounts. The company has grown to reach more than 5 million users nationwide since its inception in 2003. Investors include Sequoia Capital, Greylock, Marc Andreessen (co-founder of Netscape and chairman of Opsware), Joe Kraus (co-founder of Excite), Josh Kopelman (founder of Half.com), and Peter Thiel (co-founder of PayPal).
Annual Sales (mil.) $3.0
Total Employees 24
Employees At This Location 24
Chairman; President, Products Reid Hoffman
VP and Chief of Staff Sarah Imbach
VP Business and Corporate Development Keith S. Rabois
VP Engineering Jean-Luc Vaillant
VP Marketing Konstantin Guericke
VP Product Strategy Allen Blue
VP Client Products Jaime Templeton
Chief Privacy Officer Duncan Work
Director Corporate Communications Kay Luo
Director Advertising David Hahn
Director Technology Yan Pujante
Director Operations Candy Mielke
Director Product Management Lucian Beebe
Director Sales Brendon Cassidy
Senior Technical Recruiter Hilary Taubman-Dye
Manager Corporate Development Steven Stegman
Senior Systems Architect Ian McNish
CEO Daniel T. H. (Dan) Nye Age 40
I looked at their telephone numbers and using one of my handy dandy stab-in tricks I dialed a little beyond it. I can tell you 650 687 3615 is a live body! So will (probably be,
3616, 3617, etc.) It seems they have 18 (of their 24?) employees listed so I'd stick close to the 3600 when dialing!
Loretta Thomas Customer Support Liaison San Fran
Poor thing, she's about to get deluged. She's there Ãs I checked!
They also appear to have a customer support center in Omaha:
Angela Burleigh Customer Support
Sakessa Moss Customer Support
Rob McClenahan Customer Support Professional
William Conner Customer Support Professional Support@LinkedIn.com
Suzy Jackson Customer Support
;)
By the way the company directory spills with just ONE entry - pressing A for any names starting with A,B or C gives you about ten names, and some of them appear to be first names starting with A, B or c as well as last names starting with same.
CALL 3616, said I COMPLY!!!!! 8/7/08
The interface is *awful* - I wish it could be a bit more Vimeo, and a bit less Youtube (from a design point of view).
Post a Comment
<< Home